US and Russia face deep differences ahead of talks with Ukraine | Politics
WILMINGTON, Delaware (AP) – After difficult discussions between Presidents Joe Biden and Vladimir Putin over the build-up of Russian troops on the Ukrainian border, both sides insist they hope that a way of appeasing the tensions could open during diplomatic talks scheduled for January.
But less than two weeks before the meeting of senior American and Russian officials in Geneva, the chasm is deep and the prospect of finding a way out of the crisis is not without complications.
Biden told reporters on Friday that he informed Putin in a telephone interview a day earlier that the upcoming talks could only work if the Russian leader “defuses, not escalates, the situation” in the days to come. . The US president has said he is also seeking to convey to Putin that the United States and its allies are prepared to strike Russia with punitive sanctions if the Russians invade Ukraine further.
“I have made it clear to President Putin that if he takes any further steps in Ukraine, we will have severe sanctions,” Biden said. “We will increase our presence in Europe with NATO allies. There will be a price to pay.”
Meanwhile, Biden’s national security team focused Friday on preparing for talks in Geneva, scheduled for January 9 and 10, to discuss regrouping some 100,000 Russian troops on its border with Ukraine.
The Geneva talks, which are to be led on the US side by senior State Department officials, are expected to be followed by Russia-NATO Council talks and a meeting of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. .
Biden is due to speak by phone Sunday with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The two leaders plan to review preparations for upcoming diplomatic engagements, according to the White House.
Secretary of State Antony Blinken briefed Canadian Foreign Minister MÃ©lanie Joly, Italian Foreign Minister Luigi Di Maio and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg on the Biden-Putin appeal on Friday and discussed the preparations for the next summit.
“The next two weeks are going to be difficult,” said Daniel Fried, former US Ambassador to Poland who was a top Eastern European advisor to Presidents Barack Obama, George W. Bush. and Bill Clinton. âThe Biden administration did a fairly credible job of describing, framing the negotiations. But the most difficult test is yet to come, as Putin will continue to engage in threats and collapsing maneuvers to see how determined we are. “
As Biden reiterated his readiness to impose punitive sanctions that would reverberate across Russia, Kremlin officials redoubled warning Biden to make a “colossal mistake” that could have huge ramifications for one. already strained US-Russian relationship.
A senior Putin official confirmed on Friday that Russia is maintaining its demands for written security guarantees. Moscow wants codified that any future NATO expansion must exclude Ukraine and the other countries of the former Soviet bloc and demands that the bloc withdraw offensive weapons from countries in the Russian neighborhood.
“We will not allow our initiatives to be drowned in endless discussions,” Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told the state news agency RIA-Novosti on Friday. “If no constructive response arrives within a reasonable time and the West continues its aggressive course, Russia will have to take all necessary measures to maintain a strategic balance and eliminate unacceptable threats to our security.”
The Biden administration and NATO allies have made it clear that the Russian demands are unfounded.
The seemingly unrealistic rhetoric has made some in Washington question how effective the talks can be.
Following the Biden-Putin appeal, a group of 24 former US national security officials and Russian experts – a group that includes several officials who served in the Obama, George W. Bush and Clinton administrations – released a statement calling on Biden to immediately, and publicly, lay out the sanctions Russia would incur if Putin were to proceed with military action.
Signatories to the declaration included several former U.S. ambassadors, including Fried, Russian envoys Michael McFaul and Alexander Vershbow, and Ukrainian envoys Steven Pifer and John Herbst.
“We believe that the United States should, in close consultation with its NATO allies and with Ukraine, take immediate steps to change the Kremlin’s cost-benefit calculations before the Russian leadership opts for a new military escalation, âthe group wrote. âSuch a response would include a package of major and painful sanctions that would be applied immediately if Russia attacks Ukraine. Ideally, the outline of these sanctions would be communicated to Moscow now, so that the Kremlin clearly understands the scale of the economic blow it will face. “
The Russians, for their part, continue to argue that they face an existential threat with Ukraine.
Lavrov noted on Friday an increase in arms deliveries to Ukraine and the growing number and scope of joint military exercises conducted by Western powers with Ukraine, saying “the Kiev regime naturally sees this support as a card white for the use of force “. He added that Russia will protect its citizens living in eastern Ukraine.
“As for the inhabitants of Donbass, where hundreds of thousands of our citizens live, Russia will take all necessary measures to protect them,” he said. “An adequate response will be given to any possible military provocation by Kiev against the Donbass.”
Simon Miles, diplomatic and international historian of the Cold War at Duke University, said it would be a mistake for the White House to let “Russia unilaterally set the pace for what is about to unfold.”
âAnything the United States can do to keep the Russians on their feet, instead of letting the Kremlin set the agenda, will be important in securing a favorable resolution,â Miles said.
Associated Press writer Vladimir Isachenkov in Moscow contributed to this report.
Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.